State Roads Commission v. Halle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• it is not incumbent upon the court to scan the record for error at the mere suggestion of a party
• “Surely it is not incumbent upon this Court, merely because a point is mentioned as being objectionable at some point in a party’s brief, to scan the entire record and ascertain if there be any ground, or grounds, to sustain the objectionable feature suggested.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).