Skip to main content
· 1/19/1955

State Public School Building Authority ex rel. Vallamont Planing Mill Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 127 F. Supp. 902
  • 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3808

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “However, because they are created after a party’s injury and in anticipation of litigation, surveillance tapes generally are considered work product.”
  • “[T]he federal ... rules require that Plaintiff make a showing of substantial need to overcome the work product doctrine. Plaintiff’s conclusory allegation that he has a ‘substantial need’ is not enough to meet the standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Follmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.