Skip to main content
· 8/13/1990

State Police v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REV.

Citations

  • 578 A.2d 1360
  • 135 Pa. Commw. 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no issue preclusion because issue in state police court martial differs from the issue of willful misconduct under the Unemployment Compensation Law
  • no issue preclusion because issue in state police court martial differs from the issue of willful misconduct under the Unemployment Compensation Law
  • \the issue in a willful misconduct case is not whether the employer had the right to discharge the employee for the conduct in question but whether the Commonwealth is justified in reinforcing that decision by denying benefits\
  • “the issue in a willful misconduct case is not whether the employer had the right to discharge the employee for the conduct in question but whether the Commonwealth is justified in reinforcing that decision by denying benefits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crumlish, Jr., President Judge, Pellegrini, J., and Silvestri, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.