State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass'n of Professional Employees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an arbitrator’s decision will not be reviewed or set aside for mistake of either law or fact
• holding that an arbitrator's decision will not be reviewed or set aside for mistake of either law or fact
• holding that ‘“courts will not overturn an award merely because they may disagree with the arbitrator’s decision on the merits’ ”
• holding that \`courts will not overturn an award merely because they may disagree with the arbitrator's decision on the merits'\
• recognizing that while employee’s conduct would have been sufficient grounds for discharge, the arbitrator, in the absence of any language to the contrary, was free to determine that such conduct was only grounds for disciplining the employee
• stating that a terminated employee's conduct may violate a well-defined and dominant public policy, but the arbitrator's award does not automatically also violate that public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).