State of West Virginia v. Tyquan Livermon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiffs’ clear record of delay was evidenced by their failure to submit “any documentation or other evidence to the district court corroborating their explanation for the delay”
• noting that an abuse of discretion requires a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence before the district court
• observing that plaintiffs “did not properly file their declarations by the [extended] deadline”
• finding delay where plaintiffs failed to submit wet-ink signatures for several months after the deadline
• finding a clear record of delay where plaintiffs failed to submit wet-ink signatures as ordered by the court for months after the deadline
• affirming dismissal of plaintiffs' claims for failure to comply with PTO 60 \[g]iven the number of opportunities the district court gave Plaintiffs to either comply with PTO 60 [or] explain why they could not do so\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).