Skip to main content
· 6/17/2016

State of West Virginia v. Terrance J. McGuirk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that officer was justified in warrantless seizure of cell phone to prevent destruction of evidence, when immediately followed by application for search warrant
  • affirming a seizure of cell phones under the plain-view doctrine because officers had “probable cause to believe that [seized] phones likely had evidentiary value in the investigation of the suspected crimes”
  • “The 25 claims carve out a specific location for the filtering system (a remote ISP server) and require the 26 filtering system to give users the ability to customize filtering for their individual network 27 accounts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.