State of West Virginia v. Natosha Kuhn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a pro se attorney was not entitled to recover fees under the Freedom of Information Act, which allows recovery of fees “reasonably incurred”
• considering an issue that appellant did not raise in opening brief after appellee throughly discussed it
• considering an antitrust theory waived that plaintiff “recognized was available but expressly chose not to pursue” because that would impermissibly allow a “second bite at the apple”
• “above cost below-market level pricing even when coupled with a structural showing such as recoupment, cannot constitute predatory pricing.”
• “It is a general rule that a party cannot revisit theories that it raises but abandons at summary judgment.”
• “It is a general rule that a party cannot revisit theories that it raises but abandons at summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).