State of West Virginia v. Misty Dawn Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trustee of a real estate investment trust was the real party in interest for diversity purposes
• holding that HSBC, the 24 trustee, was sued in its own name and therefore its citizenship was all that mattered 25 for purposes of diversity
• explaining that diversity jurisdiction requires “complete diversity of citizenship, meaning that the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each defendant” (quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that diversity jurisdiction requires “complete diversity of citizenship, meaning that the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each defendant.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• determining that “when a trustee files a lawsuit or is sued in her own name, her citizenship is all that matters for diversity purposes.” (quoting , 136 S.Ct. at 1016)
• stating diversity jurisdiction “requires complete diversity of citizenship, meaning that the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).