State of West Virginia v. Gino Renaldo Estep

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the AEDPA does not apply to cases that were filed before the April 1996 effective date of the AEDPA
• holding that the provisions of the AEDPA \apply only to cases filed after the Act became effective\
• holding that the AEDPA amendments to § 2254 apply only to cases filed after AEDPA's effective date
• holding that the Chapter 153 amendments, which apply to all federal habeas petitions, are inapplicable to federal habeas petitions pending on the date of the AEDPA’s enactment
• concluding that AEDPA provisions apply “only to cases filed after [AEDPA] became effective”
• holding that one year is “reasonable period” for purposes of § 2255 grace period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).