Skip to main content
· 8/30/2022

State of West Virginia v. Daniel R. Plants, II

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • one \borderline\ blood pressure reading did not constitute evidence of hypertension so as to require claimant to file claim under § 7-433c within one year
  • one “borderline” blood pressure reading did not constitute evidence of hypertension so as to require claimant to file claim under § 7-433c within one year
  • \the claimant's knowledge of high blood pressure readings is crucial to the determination of whether the [employer] was put on timely notice of the claim for benefits\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.