State of Washington v. Maricopa County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that affidavits containing “statements of legal conclusions . . . should have been disregarded” in resolving summary judgment motion
• statements in 26 affidavit made on information and belief “should have been disregarded”
• statements 2 in affidavit made on information and belief “should have been disregarded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).