Skip to main content
· 4/6/2020

State Of Washington v. Honolulu Molia

Citations

  • 460 P.3d 1086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • admissible extrinsic evidence does not include evidence of a party's unilateral or subjective intent as to contract's meaning
  • admissible extrinsic evidence does not include evidence of a party’s unilateral or subjective intent as to contract’s meaning
  • evidence of a party's unilateral or subjective intent as to contract's meaning is inadmissible extrinsic evidence
  • evidence of a party’s unilateral or subjective intent as to contract’s meaning is inadmissible extrinsic evidence
  • Extrinsic evidence of a party’s unilateral or subjective intent as to a contract’s meaning may not be used.
  • summary judgment not proper if parties’ written contract, viewed in light of parties’ other objective manifestations, has two or more reasonable but competing meanings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.