· 1/27/2016
State Of Washington, Resp. v. Alan J. Sinclair Ii, App.27
Citations
- 192 Wash. App. 380
- 367 P.3d 612
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that while ability to pay is an important 6 State v. Blazina, 182 Wn.2d 827, 344 P.3d 680 (2015
- stating that ability to pay was an important but not an indispensable factor for the court in the exercise of its discretion to impose appellate costs
- stating that ability to pay was an important but not an indispensable factor for the court in the exercise of its discretion to impose appellate costs
- noting that while ability to pay is an important factor that may be considered under RCW 10.73.160, it is not necessarily the only relevant factor, nor is it necessarily an indispensable factor
- noting that the Rules of Appellate Procedure establish a presumption of continued indigency
- noting that the Rules of Appellate Procedure establish a presumption of continued indigency
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Becker, Dwyer, Leach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.