State of Tennessee v. Timothy Clark Naifeh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding due process does not require the district court to do more than comply with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32, even where defendant argues collateral consequences of inclusion of objected-to information
• applying good faith exception because the reasonableness of the illegal predicate search was \close enough to the line of validity\ to make an officer's belief in the validity of the warrant objectively reasonable
• “In this case we need not consider how Jardines applies to interior hallways of an apartment complex.”
• walkway leading to two townhouse doorways – “‘common’ only to [the defendant] and his immediate neighbor” – falls within curtilage
• “In this case we need not consider how Jardines applies to interior hallways of an apartment complex.”
• “The Supreme Court did not reach the expectation of privacy test ... and we need not rely on Katz ... to decide our case.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).