State of Tennessee v. Terry Eugene Fisher, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court should have promptly dismissed case for lack of personal jurisdiction rather than dismissing under Anti-SLAPP statute
• holding that accessibility of allegedly defamatory statements within District is inadequate to establish that defendant engages in persistent course of conduct within that District
• holding that the district court must consider a challenge to personal jurisdiction before considering the merits of a claim
• holding that district court should have promptly dismissed case for lack of personal jurisdiction rather than dismissing under Anti-SLAPP statute
• holding that subsection (a)(1) did not supply personal jurisdiction over defendant who “had not even visited the District of Columbia for any purpose” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that “Subsection (a)(4)’s reach is far more cabined” than the federal Due Process Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).