Skip to main content
· 11/8/2018

State of Tennessee v. Steve M. Jarman - concurring Opinion

Syllabus

I join in the majority's disposition of this case. I write separately because it is my view that the references to passion and provocation by their very nature express neither elements of voluntary manslaughter that the State is required to prove nor an absolute defense instead, they are a type of built-in mitigation to a knowing or intentional killing.

Judges: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.