State of Tennessee v. Robert Edward Seaton

Syllabus

Following a jury trial, the Defendant, Robert Edward Seaton, was convicted of facilitation of theft of property valued at $2,500 or more but less than $10,000, a Class E felony, and one count each of vandalism, evading arrest, and driving with a revoked license, second offense, Class A misdemeanors. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-11-403, -14-103, -14-105, - 14-408, -16-603, 55-50-504. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant contends (1) that the trial court erred by denying the Defendant's motion for a mistrial when a court officer, who was acting as jury custodian, was called and sworn as a rebuttal witness (2) that the court erred by denying the Defendant's motion for a mistrial after the court elicited from a defense witness the name of the witness's father-in-law, who was \a notorious criminal and murderer\ (3) that the court erred by admitting reputation or opinion evidence from three law enforcement officers regarding a defense witness's character for truthfulness (4) that plain error occurred when the State cross-examined a defense witness regarding prior criminal behavior not resulting in a conviction and (5) that the cumulative effect of these errors deprived the Defendant of a fair trial. Following our review, we conclude that the admission of reputation and opinion evidence from law enforcement officers constitutes reversible error such that the Defendant is entitled to a new trial. Alternatively, we conclude that the Defendant would be entitled to relief due to cumulative error.