State of Tennessee v. Richard Gleason

Syllabus

Defendant, Richard Gleason, was indicted by the Shelby County Grand Jury for rape of a child and aggravated sexual battery. Following a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual battery. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Defendant to concurrent sentences of 12 years' imprisonment. Defendant raises ten issues in this appeal as of right. Defendant asserts that: 1) the trial court erred by not requiring the State to provide him a bill of particulars 2) the trial court erred by not excluding the narrative portion of a medical report admitted as an exhibit 3) the trial court erred by allowing the victim's mother to testify about a prior consistent statement of the victim 4) the trial court erred by not permitting evidence of domestic violence between the victim's mother and the victim's mother's boyfriend 5) the State made improper statements during closing argument 6) Defendant's due process rights were violated by a pre-indictment delay 7) the State's election of offenses was overly vague and insufficient 8) the trial court erred by considering non-statutory factors in sentencing Defendant 9) the evidence at trial was insufficient to support Defendant's convictions and 10) Defendant is entitled to relief for cumulative error. Having reviewed the entire record, we conclude that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence statements made by the victim to her mother. The two times hearsay evidence was admitted were through a medical report and also during the mother's testimony during trial. The statements should have been excluded as hearsay, and it was error for the trial court to allow the statements. We conclude, however, that both errors were harmless and did not affect the outcome of the trial. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.