State of Tennessee v. Phillip Pack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the physical evidence “coupled by the defendant’s statement to police” corroborated the accomplice’s testimony
• concluding that the physical evidence “coupled by the defendant’s statement to police” corroborated the accomplice’s testimony
• holding that because the defendant failed to make a contemporaneous objection during closing arguments, he not only had to establish that the comments were improper but also that they constituted plain error
• holding that because the defendant failed to make a contemporaneous objection during closing arguments, he not only had to establish that the comments were improper but also that they constituted plain error
• holding that because the defendant failed to make a contemporaneous objection during closing arguments, he not only had to establish that the comments were improper but also that they constituted plain error
• holding that because the defendant failed to make a contemporaneous objection during closing arguments, he not only had to establish that the comments were improper but also that they constituted plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).