State of Tennessee v. Petr Pompa
Syllabus
The Defendant, Petr Pompa, was convicted by a Davidson County jury of two counts of sexual battery by an authority figure and two counts of statutory rape by an authority figure. On appeal, the Defendant argues that (1) the trial court erred in allowing inadmissible opinion, character, and hearsay testimony at trial (2) the trial court erred in excluding evidence of the victim's motive to fabricate the allegations against the Defendant (3) the trial court erred in allowing the victim to remain in the courtroom following her testimony (4) the trial court erred in denying the Defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal as to counts five and six and (5) the Defendant's sentence was unlawful. Upon review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Judges: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.