State of Tennessee v. Paul H. Clever

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that use of prior DUI convictions under subsequently enacted enhancement statute violated ex post facto rule, because defendant was “not being punished anew for his prior convictions, but rather for a subsequent offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).