Skip to main content
· 2/24/2022

State of Tennessee v. Marcus Malone

Syllabus

The Defendant, Marcus Malone, appeals as of right from his convictions for second degree murder, attempted first degree murder, five counts of attempted second degree murder, twelve counts of aggravated assault, six counts of employing a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, and reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon, for which the trial court imposed an effective sentence of one hundred thirty-three years. The Defendant contends that (1) the trial court erred by denying the Defendant's motion to suppress his police statement (2) the trial court erred by failing to inquire into the Defendant's request for substitute counsel (3) the trial court erred by instructing the jury on criminal responsibility and by failing to instruct the jury on facilitation or self-defense (4) the evidence was insufficient to establish his identity as the shooter (5) his sentence is excessive (6) the trial court erred by imposing partial consecutive service and (7) his aggregate sentence is unconstitutional in light of his status as a juvenile at the time of the offenses. After a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “None of the words of a statute is to be regarded as superfluous . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.