State of Tennessee v. Maka Fuller, Jr.
Syllabus
A Madison County jury convicted the Defendant, Maka Fuller, Jr., of aggravated robbery. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced him to eleven years in prison. On appeal, the Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction because he did not use a weapon to accomplish the robbery. Finding that there is sufficient evidence to support the Defendant's conviction for aggravated robbery, we affirm the trial court.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to determine whether New York permits cross- jurisdictional tolling and certifying the question to the New York State Court of Appeals
- describing “reasonable reliance by putative class members on the pending class action” as one of the “principles from which American Pipe tolling derives”
- on a Rule 12(c) motion, a court must “accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true and draw all reasonable inferences in [the plaintiff’s] favor”
- together with the July 1995 Order, the \1995 Orders\
- discussing the \return jurisdiction\ clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.