State of Tennessee v. Lavonte Dominique Simmon

Syllabus

The Defendant, Lavonte Dominique Simmon, appeals as of right his jury convictions for first degree premeditated murder and two counts of aggravated assault. On appeal, the Defendant alleges the following errors: (1) that the Defendant was deprived of his right to present a viable defense when the trial court permitted Charles Maples to assert the privilege against self-incrimination and, thereafter, refused to allow defense counsel to withdraw so that defense counsel could testify about Mr. Maples' past statements (2) that the trial court improperly denied the Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment after the State failed to preserve exculpatory evidence in the form of Mr. Maples' testimony (3) that the trial court should have granted the Defendant's motion to suppress his statement to the police in light of testimony that the Defendant suffered a brain injury causing intellectual impairment, that the Defendant invoked his right to counsel, and that the Defendant did not voluntarily waive his Miranda rights (4) that the trial court erred by allowing the State to introduce numerous photographs of weapons, weapons-related items, and ammunition found during the search of the home where the Defendant was apprehended (5) that the evidence was insufficient to support the Defendant's convictions because the State failed to prove that the Defendant was the person who shot the murder victim or that the Defendant acted with premeditation and (6) that the trial court should have instructed the jury on diminished capacity.2 Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.