State of Tennessee v. Justin Ray Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating Washington’s “recogni[tion] [of] invasion of privacy by false 8 light as an independent claim”
• affirming a summary judgment in favor of the defendant where the plaintiffs 13 failed to present prima facie evidence of falsity
• “[A] stated opinion may be 14 actionable if it implies defamatory facts.”
• considering the falsity requirements for defamation and false light claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).