State of Tennessee v. John Foxx
Syllabus
Defendant, John Foxx, was convicted following a jury trial of sale of less than .5 grams of a Schedule II controlled substance, delivery of less than .5 grams of a Schedule II controlled substance, and simple possession. The trial court ordered Defendant to serve an effective fifteen-year sentence after application of the criminal street gang enhancement statute. On appeal, Defendant argues that the trial court erred in applying the criminal street gang enhancement statute because the statute is unconstitutional and because the evidence was insufficient to support application of the criminal street gang enhancement statute. Following our review of the entire record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assistant librarian at a junior college considered a “mechanic, laborer or workman” under G. L. c. 152, § 1 (4)(a), as then in effect
- a “nonprofessional, nonsupervisoiy clerical employee . . . making only $60 a week and performing the secretarial, receptionist, stenographic and record keeping functions . . . can be considered a laborer, workman or mechanic for the purposes of . . . the Workmen’s Compensation Act”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Jill Bartee Ayers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.