State of Tennessee v. Jason Burns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that hearing the defendant‟s name qualified as a startling event which caused the child to react but ultimately excluding the evidence because the victim‟s nonverbal reaction was too ambiguous to be connected with the defendant‟s act of child abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).