State of Tennessee v. Izaiha Gleaves
Syllabus
The Appellant, Izaiha Gleaves, was convicted of second degree murder, attempted second degree murder, two counts of employment of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, aggravated assault, and tampering with evidence. The trial court imposed an effective sentence of forty-nine years' confinement. On appeal, the Appellant argues: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions (2) the trial court erred when it failed to excuse a juror who had a conflict of interest (3) the trial court erred when it admitted a redacted recording of a witness interview (4) the trial court's cumulative errors warrant reversal and (5) the trial court erred when it imposed an effective sentence of forty-nine years.1 After review, we affirm the trial court's judgments.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[The district court] did no more than we previously have allowed by looking at the plea colloquy transcript . . . ; it relied on readily available facts to which both sides expressly stipulated that clearly fit within the statutory definition of a crime of violence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.