State of Tennessee v. Gregory Eidson

Syllabus

The Defendant, Gregory Eidson, was convicted by a jury of driving under the influence (\DUI\) and received a sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days. On appeal, the Defendant argues that (1) the trial court committed reversible error by failing to appoint a court reporter (2) he and his counsel were improperly excluded from the grand jury proceedings (3) counsel was ineffective at the preliminary hearing (4) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements made to an officer before being read his Miranda warnings (5) the trial court erred in admitting the results of his blood test (6) the trial court was biased, failed to correct prosecutorial misconduct, and denied the Defendant his right to a speedy trial and (7) the trial court erred in dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus in a separate case. After a review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.