State of Tennessee v. Daniel Nesbit
Syllabus
Defendant, Daniel Nesbit, was indicted for felony murder and attempted especially aggravated robbery for his role in the shooting death of the victim, Jernario Taylor. After a jury trial, Defendant was convicted as charged and sentenced to an effective sentence of life imprisonment. Defendant appeals, arguing that: (1) the trial court erred in granting the State a continuance over the objection of defense counsel (2) the State failed to disclose exculpatory evidence (3) the trial court erred by admitting a recording of a telephone call between the co-defendant and his girlfriend (4) the trial court erred by failing to grant a mistrial (5) the trial court erred by allowing the State to argue inconsistent theories (6) the trial court erred by admitting evidence of Defendant's arrest in Alabama (7) the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions (8) the trial court erred by failing to disclose a note received from the jury during deliberations and (9) cumulative error necessitates a reversal of Defendant's convictions. Having carefully reviewed the record before us and the briefs of the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Judges: Presiding Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.