State of Tennessee v. Dan E. Durell

Syllabus

Petitioner, Dan E. Durell, filed a \Motion for Correction of Sentencing Documents\ (\the Motion\), claiming that the judgments in Case Nos. 29089 and 29090 did not conform to the trial court's pronounced sentence, and as a result, his sentences were illegal. The trial court treated the Motion as a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. The court determined that the Motion failed to raise a colorable claim and summarily dismissed the Motion. Discerning no error, we affirm.