State of Tennessee v. Cameron Henderson
Syllabus
Defendant, Cameron Henderson, appeals his Shelby County convictions for sexual battery and aggravated sexual battery for which he received an effective sentence of 7.2 years of confinement as an especially mitigated offender to be served at a rate of 100 percent. On appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of other bad acts pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Evidence 404(b), in declining to instruct the jury on child abuse and neglect as a lesser included offense of aggravated sexual battery, and in ordering him to serve 100 percent of his sentence. Because Defendant failed to file a timely motion for new trial and a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A plaintiff ‘must do more than simply allege that an employer’s stated reasons are inaccurate; [she] must still have some circumstances to support an inference that there was an improper motivation proscribed by law.’”
- “A plaintiff ‘must do more than simply allege that an employer’s stated reasons are inac- curate; [she] must still have some circumstances to support an inference that there was an improper motivation proscribed by law.’” (alteration in original
- “A plaintiff ‘must do more than simply allege that an employer’s stated reasons are inac- curate; [she] must still have some circumstances to support an inference that there was an improper motivation proscribed by law.’” (alteration in original
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Matthew J. Wilson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.