State of Tennessee v. Brandon D. Washington
Syllabus
The defendant, Brandon D. Washington, appeals as of right from the Shelby County Criminal Court's denial of his Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1 motion to correct an illegal sentence. The basis for the defendant's appeal is the trial court's alleged failure to accurately apply pretrial jail credits and other credits. Following our review, we conclude that the defendant failed to state a colorable claim and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A defendant’s online review of a competitor’s sale and installation of the same product sold and installed by the defendant is a statement that meets” the third element of the commercial speech exemption.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.