State of Tennessee v. Benjamin Foust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that admission of the challenged autopsy photograph was harmless error when “several other graphic and gruesome autopsy photographs [were] admitted” without objection from the defendant
• “There is no dispute that the Defendant‟s prior convictions for aggravated robbery and aggravated burglary qualify as felony convictions involving the use of violence and force, respectively.”
• “Graphic, gruesome, or even horrifying photographs of crime victims may be admitted into evidence if they are relevant to some issue at trial and probative value is not [substantially] outweighed by their prejudicial effect.” (alteration in Foust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).