State of Tennessee v. Antonio M. Crockett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “allowing a party to contest a partial decree outside of the SRBA would undermine any certainty or finality of the partial decree”
• affirming the district court’s decision that IDWR did not err under section 67-5279(3) without ever reaching whether Rangen’s substantial rights were prejudiced
• “If Rangen wanted its water rights to be interpreted differently, it should have timely asserted that in the SRBA.”
• “Any interpretation of Rangen’s partial decrees that is inconsistent with their plain language would necessarily impact the certainty and finality of SRBA judgments and, therefore, requests for such interpretations needed to be made in the SRBA itself.”
• language in water law decree referring to specific tunnel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).