State of Tennessee v. Antonio Burkhart, Alias Antonio Markezzee Burkhart
Syllabus
In two consolidated cases, the Defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of violating the sex offender registry, reserving two certified questions of law pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 37(b)(2) regarding the validity of his original judgment and the validity of the reporting requirements. After review, we affirm the trial court's judgments.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that any error in admitting Rule 414 witnesses was cured by jury instructions
- “[W]e have recognized that district courts can mitigate any potential jury bias from Rule 414 witnesses by giving limiting instructions.”
- considering only factors disputed by the defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.