State of Tennessee v. Adam Janes
Syllabus
The Defendant, Adam Janes, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 35. Specifically, the Defendant argues that: (1) he received the ineffective assistance of trial counsel (2) he entered into his guilty plea unknowingly and involuntarily (3) the assistant district attorney was prejudiced against him (4) he was entitled to concurrent sentences (5) he was not given the opportunity of rehabilitation (6) his sentence was not the least severe measure necessary to achieve the purposes for which the sentence was imposed and (7) the State failed to file a notice of intent to seek enhanced punishment. After review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.