State of Tennessee v. Adam Christopher Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the petitioner knew or should have known about his interests-of-justice claim, which stemmed from the district court’s response to a jury question, at the time of trial
• holding that the postconviction court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant knew or should have known of his jury-instruction claim at trial because the defendant’s counsel objected to the instruction at trial
• “We have repeatedly declined to apply a subjective standard to the interests-of-justice exception [and] we decline Bolstad’s invitation to adopt a subjective standard to measure the accrual of a claim under the interests-of-justice exception.”
• explaining procedures under the use-immunity statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).