· 6/18/1981
State of Oklahoma v. Richard S. Schweiker
Citations
- 655 F.2d 401
- 210 U.S. App. D.C. 288
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “one who contests congressional exercises of the spending power must show that by no reasonable possibility can the challenged legislation fall within the wide range of discretion permitted to the Congress” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- stating that \one who contests congressional exercises of the spending power must show that by no reasonable possibility can the challenged legislation fall within the wide range of discretion permitted to the Congress\ (internal quota- tion marks omitted)
- “The courts are not suited to evaluating whether the states are faced here with an offer they cannot refuse or merely a hard choice.”
- “The courts are not suited to evaluating whether the states are faced here with an offer they cannot refuse or merely a hard choice.”
- \The courts are not suited to evaluating whether the states are faced here with an offer they cannot refuse or merely a hard choice.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tamm, Wald, Mikva
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.