Skip to main content
· 6/18/1981

State of Oklahoma v. Richard S. Schweiker

Citations

  • 655 F.2d 401
  • 210 U.S. App. D.C. 288
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “one who contests congressional exercises of the spending power must show that by no reasonable possibility can the challenged legislation fall within the wide range of discretion permitted to the Congress” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • stating that \one who contests congressional exercises of the spending power must show that by no reasonable possibility can the challenged legislation fall within the wide range of discretion permitted to the Congress\ (internal quota- tion marks omitted)
  • “The courts are not suited to evaluating whether the states are faced here with an offer they cannot refuse or merely a hard choice.”
  • “The courts are not suited to evaluating whether the states are faced here with an offer they cannot refuse or merely a hard choice.”
  • \The courts are not suited to evaluating whether the states are faced here with an offer they cannot refuse or merely a hard choice.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamm, Wald, Mikva

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.