Skip to main content
· 6/26/1984

State of NY v. General Elec. Co.

Citations

  • 592 F. Supp. 291
  • 21 ERC 1097
  • 14 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20719
  • 21 ERC (BNA) 1097
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is “apparent that the rule in this circuit embodies the principle that such notice requirements,” like the one contained in the CWA, are “not jurisdictional”
  • holding manufacturer who sold PCB-laced oil to drag strip could be liable
  • sale of used transformer oil to be used for dust control was an arrangement for treatment or disposal under CERCLA
  • sale of used transformer oil to drag-strip for use in controlling dust
  • state action for recovery of response costs
  • state action for recovery of response costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.