STATE OF NEW YORK v. DECAPUA, STEVEN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that the district court’s “reasoning [must be] sufficient to justify excluding the continuance from the Act’s seventy-day limit”
• providing that the district court’s “reasoning [must be] sufficient to justify excluding the continuance from the Act’s seventy-day limit”
• declining to reach challenge to three-level enhancement because it did not affect the Guidelines range
• applying harmless error review to mistakes made in Guidelines calculations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).