STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BARRY BERRY STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KENNETH DANIELS STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEVELL BURNETT (17-06-1583, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court may not treat an appeal of the commission’s decision “as a trial de novo on the record which was before the administrative board”
• “[a] court may not displace an administrative board’s choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo”
• where fact finder made “choice between two fairly conflicting views” supported by substantial evidence, “court may not displace [fact finder’s] choice . . . even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).