STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF C.F. STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF A.G. STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF T.S. (FJ-12-0124-19, FJ-12-1196-18, AND FJ-12-1197-18, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not deny the defendant “a fair trial” when it “asked witnesses questions,” and “limited 23 [the] questioning of a witness,” in order to “clarify and organize information for the jury”
• noting that “[w]e have no occasion to opine on the validity of” Atkins and similar cases
• explaining “solicitude for pro se litigants does not require [courts] to excuse failure to comply with understandable procedural rules”
• “solicitude for pro se litigants does not require us to excuse failure to comply with understandable procedural rules”
• “We reject[] the notion that a notice of death cannot be filed until after a representative for the decedent’s estate has been appointed[.]”
• “We reject[] the notion that a notice of death cannot be filed until after a representative for the decedent’s estate has been appointed[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).