State of New Hampshire v. Lisa Collyns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]bsent ambiguity, the parties’ intent will be determined from the plain meaning of the language used in the contract” (quotation omitted)
• to prevail on his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, the defendant must demonstrate that no rational trier of fact, viewing all of the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in the light most favorable to the State, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).