State of New Hampshire v. Jamie Locke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that our cases have not 4 consistently applied our “same evidence” test and “invit[ing] parties in future cases to ask us to reconsider our double jeopardy jurisprudence”
• noting that our cases have not consistently applied our “same evidence” test and “invit[ing] parties in future cases to ask us to reconsider our double jeopardy jurisprudence” under the State Constitution (quotation omitted)
• expressing doubt as to whether cases applying the same evidence test can be reconciled, and inviting parties in future cases to ask us to reconsider our double jeopardy jurisprudence consistent with principles of stare decisis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).