State of New Hampshire v. Catherine Bailey & a.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[f]ederal precedent employs the same standard [as we employ under our constitution] to assess the constitutionality of restrictions on the time, place, and manner of expressive activities taking place in a public forum.” (quotation omitted)
• holding a park curfew ordinance constitutional as applied to individuals seeking to protest in the park overnight because the protesters 7 could “communicate their message in the manner that they wished” at other times of day, even if such protest “may have been less effective”
• “[T]he validity of the regulation depends on the relation it bears to the overall problem the government seeks to correct, not on the extent to which it furthers the government’s interests in an individual case.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).