State of Nevada v. Justice Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the justice court has no jurisdiction to order discovery in a preliminary hearing because “[t]o conclude otherwise would turn the preliminary hearing into a trial, resulting in significant delays and an increased burden on the judicial system”
• electing to entertain petition for writ of prohibition even though relief should have been sought first in district court “due to the exigent circumstances presented and because this case presented an unsettled issue of statewide importance”
• electing to entertain petition for writ of prohibition even though relief should have been sought first in district court “due to the exigent circumstances presented and because this case presented an unsettled issue of statewide importance”
• electing to entertain petition for writ of prohibition even though relief should have been sought first in district court “due to the exigent circumstances presented and because this case presented an unsettled issue of statewide importance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).