Skip to main content
· 6/27/2023

State of Missouri v. Nicholas A. Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting taxpayer’s argument that “targeting a forum” means targeting only one state to the exclusion of others; taxpayer’s “effort to target customers in other states does not affect or diminish the constitutional significance of its effort to target customers in Oregon.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: All concur.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.