· 6/16/2015
State of Missouri v. Michael E. Amick
Citations
- 462 S.W.3d 413
- 2015 Mo. LEXIS 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that objections must be sufficiently specific to be preserved for appellate review
- stating the purpose of the rules for preservation of error is “to enable the court—the trial court first, then the appellate court—to define the precise claim made by the defendant.”
- “To preserve a claim of error, counsel must object with sufficient specificity to apprise the trial court of the grounds for the objection”
- “[Tjrial judges are presumed to know the law and to apply it in making decisions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Richard B. Teitelman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.