· 3/15/2022
State of Missouri v. Kyle Matthews
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Chapter 140D was “closely modeled on the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act”
- since Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140D was “closely modeled” on TILA, “Federal court decisions are instructive in construing parallel State statutes and State regulations.”
- since Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140D was “closely modeled” on TILA, “Federal court decisions are instructive in construing [the] parallel State statutes and State regulations.”
- safe harbor provision in Massachusetts statute “treats an overstatement of the finance charge as per se immaterial.”
- also stating that federal court decisions are instructive in construing parallel Massachusetts statutes and regulations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lisa White Hardwick, Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.