Skip to main content
· 3/15/2022

State of Missouri v. Kyle Matthews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Chapter 140D was “closely modeled on the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act”
  • since Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140D was “closely modeled” on TILA, “Federal court decisions are instructive in construing parallel State statutes and State regulations.”
  • since Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140D was “closely modeled” on TILA, “Federal court decisions are instructive in construing [the] parallel State statutes and State regulations.”
  • safe harbor provision in Massachusetts statute “treats an overstatement of the finance charge as per se immaterial.”
  • also stating that federal court decisions are instructive in construing parallel Massachusetts statutes and regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lisa White Hardwick, Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.